Every year, the LAN conducts a national effort to assess the adoption of APMs over time and track progress towards the LAN’s goals. Since its start in 2015, the Measurement Effort has evolved to incorporate data from a large sample of payers that represent nearly 80% of covered Americans, and now serves as the most comprehensive snapshot available for measuring progress on payment reform. In 2018, the LAN began reporting payment data by line of business—Commercial, Medicaid, Medicare Advantage, and Traditional Medicare. Explore the 2019 Measurement Effort results below, and view past reports to track the year-over-year progress in APM adoption.

 Measurement Effort Data Collection Process 

View Reports

2019 Report

cover_2019_MEASUREMENT

2018 Report

2017 Report

2016 Report

Copyright © 1997-2019, The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. MITRE is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation. Material on this site may be copied and distributed with permission only.

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account

2019 Measurement Effort

The 2019 HCP-LAN APM Measurement Effort includes data from the HCP-LAN survey, surveys fielded by America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) and the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association (BCBSA), and Traditional Medicare. Conducted from May to July 2019, the survey process collected data from 70 participants, accounting for nearly 226.5 million Americans, or 77%, of the covered U.S. population. The data reflects payment activity in calendar year 2018. Health plans, states, and Traditional Medicare reported the total dollars paid to providers according to the LAN’s Refreshed APM Framework, which offers a common approach to classifying payment by category and subcategory. With this data, the LAN analyzed aggregate results by category and subcategory as well as by line of business: commercial, Medicare Advantage, Medicaid, and Traditional Medicare. The results show progress, with 35.8% of total U.S. health care payments tied to alternative payment models (APMs) in 2018, a steady increase from 23% three years ago.

The LAN APM Measurement Effort revealed the following for 2018 payments:

  • 39.1% of health care dollars in Category 1 (e.g., traditional fee-for-service or other legacy payments not linked to quality)
  • 25.1% of health care dollars in Category 2 (e.g., pay-for-performance or care coordination fees)
  • 35.8% of health care dollars in a composite of Categories 3 & 4 (e.g., shared savings, shared risk, bundled payment, population-based payments, integrated finance and delivery system payments)

These results highlight a continued move away from a fee-for-service system that reimburses only on volume, and towards patient- and value-centered APMs.

Publication Info

Publication date: October 24, 2019

31 pages

Suggested Citation: Health Care Payment Learning & Action Network. Measuring Progress: Adoption of Alternative Payment Models in Commercial, Medicaid, Medicare Advantage, and Traditional Medicare Programs. October 24, 2019

The HCP-LAN invited health plans across market segments, as well as managed Medicaid FFS states, to quantify the volume of health plan in- and out-of-network spending that flows through APMs, including key areas of available pharmacy and behavioral health spending, if such data were available. Each of the questions in the survey corresponded to the categories and subcategories of the LAN’s Refreshed APM Framework, using the LAN survey tool, definitions, and methodology.

In this year’s effort, 62 health plans, 7 Medicaid FFS states, and Traditional Medicare participated; the measurement results were based on data combined across the LAN survey, the BCBSA survey, the AHIP survey, and Traditional Medicare. Health plans, states, and Traditional Medicare reported the total dollars paid to providers according to the LAN’s Refreshed APM Framework using the same survey questions and definitions. With this data, the LAN calculated aggregate results at the category and subcategory level as well as across lines of business.

For more information on the methodology, please read the Methodology and Results Report above.

2019 APM Measurement Infographic

2018 Measurement Effort

The 2018 HCP-LAN APM Measurement Effort includes data from the HCP-LAN survey, surveys fielded by America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) and the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association (BCBSA), and Medicare FFS. Conducted from May to July 2018, the survey process collected data from 65 participants, accounting for nearly 226.3 million Americans, or 77%, of the covered U.S. population. The data reflects payment activity in calendar year 2017.

Health plans, states, and Medicare FFS reported the total dollars paid to providers according to the HCP-LAN’s Refreshed APM Framework, which offers a common approach to classifying payment by category and subcategory. With this data, the HCP-LAN analyzed aggregate results by category and subcategory as well as by line of business: commercial, Medicare Advantage, Medicaid, and Medicare FFS.

The results show progress, with 34% of total U.S. health care payments tied to alternative payment models (APMs) in 2017, a steady increase from 23% two years ago.

The HCP-LAN APM Measurement Effort revealed the following for 2017 payments:

  • 41% of health care dollars in Category 1 (e.g., traditional FFS or other legacy payments not linked to quality)
  • 25% of health care dollars in Category 2 (e.g., pay-for-performance or care coordination fees)
  • 34% of health care dollars in a composite of Categories 3 and 4 (e.g., shared savings, shared risk, bundled payment, or population-based payments)

These results highlight a continued move away from a fee-for-service system that reimburses only on volume, and towards patient- and value-centered APMs.

Publication Info

Publication date: October 22, 2018
27 pages

Suggested Citation: Health Care Payment Learning & Action Network. Measuring Progress: Adoption of Alternative Payment Models in Commercial, Medicaid, Medicare Advantage, and Medicare Fee-for-Service Programs. October 22, 2018

The HCP-LAN invited health plans across market segments, as well as managed Medicaid FFS states, to quantify the volume of health plan in- and out-of-network spending that flows through APMs, including key areas of available pharmacy and behavioral health spending, if such data were available. Each of the questions in the survey corresponded to the categories and subcategories of the HCP-LAN’s Refreshed APM Framework, using the LAN survey tool, definitions, and methodology.

In this year’s effort, 61 health plans, three Medicaid FFS states, and Medicare FFS participated; the measurement results were based on data combined across the LAN survey, the BCBSA survey, the AHIP survey, and Medicare FFS. Health plans, states, and Medicare FFS reported the total dollars paid to providers according to the HCP-LAN’s Refreshed APM Framework using the same survey questions and definitions. With this data, the LAN calculated aggregate results at the category and subcategory level as well as across lines of business.

For more information on the methodology, please read the Methodology and Results Report above and view the video below.

2018 APM Measurement Infographic

2017 Measurement Effort

The report marks the second year of the LAN APM Measurement Effort, the largest and most comprehensive of its kind at the national level. The findings capture actual 2016 health care spending from four data sources: the LAN, America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association (BCBSA), and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) across commercial, Medicaid, Medicare Advantage, and fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare market segments, and categorize them according to the four categories of the original LAN APM Framework.

Conducted from June to August, 2017, the survey collected data from over 80 participants, accounting for nearly 245.4 million Americans, or 84%, of the covered U.S. population. The report shows progress with 29% of total U.S. health care payments tied to alternative payment models (APMs) in 2016 compared to 23% in 2015, a 6 percentage point increase.

The LAN APM Measurement Effort determined the following results for 2016 payments:

  • 43% of health care dollars in Category 1 (e.g., traditional FFS or other legacy payments not linked to quality)
  • 28% of health care dollars in Category 2 (e.g., pay-for-performance or care coordination fees)
  • 29% of health care dollars in a composite of Categories 3 and 4 (e.g., shared savings, shared risk, bundled payment, or population-based payments)

These results highlight the move away from a fee-for-service system that reimburses only on volume and the move toward more patient-centered APMs. First, there was a shift away from legacy FFS payments and a marked growth in Category 2, where payments are tied to value. Second, there was a 6% increase in alternative payment model payments (Category 3 and 4), bringing total APM spending to approximately $354.5 billion dollars nationally.

Publication Info

Publication date: October 30, 2017
17 pages

Suggested Citation: Health Care Payment Learning & Action Network. Measuring Progress: Adoption of Alternative Payment Models in Commercial, Medicaid, Medicare Advantage, and Fee-for-Service Medicare Programs. October 30, 2017.

The LAN invited health plans across market segments, as well as managed FFS Medicaid states, to quantify the amount of health plan in- and out-of-network spending that flows through APMs – including key areas of available pharmacy and behavioral health spending, if such data were available. Each of the questions in the survey tracked to the categories and subcategories of the original LAN APM Framework, using the LAN survey tool, definitions, and methodology.

In this year’s effort, 78 health plans, three FFS Medicaid states, and FFS Medicare participated, and combines data from the LAN survey, the BCBSA survey, the AHIP survey, and FFS Medicare. Health plans, states, and FFS Medicare reported the total dollars paid to providers according to the original APM Framework through different levels of detail, based on the survey in which they participated. With this data, the LAN calculated aggregate results for Category 1, Category 2, and a composite of Categories 3 and 4, to compare the number to the goals.

For more information on the methodology, please read the Methodology Report above and view the training video below.

The LAN APM Framework establishes standardized definitions and categories of APMs and a methodology for quantifying the adoption of APMs across the public and private sectors. The original LAN APM Framework was developed by the Alternative Payment Models Framework and Progress Tracking (APM FPT) Work Group, which was composed of public and private stakeholders and convened by the LAN Guiding Committee. In mid-2017, a refreshed Framework was released to reflect changes in market dynamics and legislation. For timing and trend reasons, this year’s APM measurement effort used the original Framework.

 

apm-framework_page_3

2017 APM Measurement Info Graphic

2016 Measurement Effort

After the release of the Framework, the LAN’s Payer Collaborative, comprised of a diverse mix or public and private health plans, convened to further shape and inform the LAN’s approach for measuring progress in adopting APMs. In mid-February, the Payer Collaborative launched a five-week pilot to determine the feasibility of obtaining internal data from plans and also to understand the investment of time and resources needed to complete the data collection. This pilot was an essential step in ensuring that the APM Framework – and the measurement aligned with it – was “road tested.” It allowed the LAN to refine the methodology and to develop precise definitions for measurement before launching the national measurement effort. This first LAN APM Measurement Effort requested health plans to provide data through two different methodologies:

  • The 2015 look-back metrics, which is a retrospective view, asked health plans to report actual dollars paid to providers during 2015 or the most recent 12 months.
  • The 2016 point-in-time metrics, which was somewhat of a prospective view, asked health plans to report dollars paid to providers based on contracts in place on January 1, 2016. Health plan dollars could be reported as the number of members attributed to APMs multiplied by an average cost per member per year. Alternatively, health plans could report the most recent spend data that was available.

When the LAN combined this data with that of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association (BCBSA), and America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), the results demonstrated the following:

  • 62% of health care dollars in Category 1
  • 15% of health care dollars in Category 2
  • 23% of health care dollars in a composite of Categories 3 and 4

A total of 70 health plans and two Medicaid FFS states participated in this initial LAN effort, representing approximately 199 million of the nation’s covered lives, and 67% of the national market (excluding FFS Medicare). More information on the LAN's first APM Measurement Effort can be found in this  APM Measurement Effort report.

Publication Info

Publication date: October 25, 2016
17 pages
Suggested Citation: Health Care Payment Learning & Action Network. Measuring Progress: Adoption of Alternative Payment Models in Commercial, Medicaid, Medicare Advantage, and Fee-for-Service Medicare Programs. October 25, 2016.

The survey sought to quantify the amount of health plan in- and out-of-network spending that flows through APMs - including key areas of pharmacy and behavioral health spending (if data were available). Each of the questions in the survey tracked to the categories and subcategories of the APM Framework. The LAN collected data through two different methodologies:

    • The 2015 look-back metrics, which is a retrospective view, asked health plans to report actual dollars paid to providers during 2015 or the most recent 12 months.
    • The 2016 point-in-time metrics, which was somewhat of a prospective view, asked health plans to report dollars paid to providers based on contracts in place on January 1, 2016. Health plan dollars could be reported as the number of members attributed to APMs multiplied by an average cost per member per year. Alternatively, health plans could report the most recent spend data that was available.

For more information on the distinctions between the two methods, please read the final report, Measuring Progress: Adoption of Alternative Payment Models in Commercial, Medicare Advantage, and State Medicaid Programs. For FAQs or to take a look at the metrics, click the links below:

National Data Collection Metrics

FAQs

The LAN APM Framework establishes standardized definitions and categories of APMs and a methodology for quantifying the adoption of APMs across the public and private sectors. The original LAN APM Framework was developed by the Alternative Payment Models Framework and Progress Tracking (APM FPT) Work Group, which was composed of public and private stakeholders and convened by the LAN Guiding Committee. In mid-2017, a refreshed Framework was released to reflect changes in market dynamics and legislation. For timing and trend reasons, this year's APM measurement effort used the original Framework. apm-framework_page_3

2015 & 2016 APM Measurement Infographic