ACC – Quality Track
Learning Stage Investing Stage Aligning Stage Transforming Stage Pay-for-Performance Collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Pay-for-Reporting Quality Outcomes Reporting (including specialty-oriented) Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes Engages provider leadership in reconciling perceived conflicts between clinical quality and governmental and health plan performance quality metrics KPI Management Transparent quality benchmarking methodology Incorporation of Patient-Reported Outcomes into performance reporting Aggregate quality reporting incorporating utilization, sites of service and patient outcomes Provider specific reporting incorporating quality, utilization, financial outcomes, and benchmark comparisons Enhanced Utilization, Financial, Quality & Outcomes Reporting across sub-populations Coordinates clinical quality and performance metrics across governmental and commercial health plans enabling synergistic improvements in health outcomes and total cost of care Quality Reporting Quality Performance Organizational Quality Management Program Quality Improvement Assessments Measurement Framework Evidence Based Decisions & Support Utilization Management Medical Policy Review Identify low-value care Utilization Management Enhancements to reduce barriers to care Standardized Medical Policies across population Develop approach to address low-value care Clinician leadership receives quality outcomes and participates in results’ interpretation Utilizes insights from reporting to support provider specific and system improvements Quality standards and benchmarks for top performance Inclusive and equitable Health Policies Ongoing monitoring of low-value care Utilization Management leveraging AI-assisted clinical reviews and gold-carding Utilizes insights from enhanced reporting to drive improvements across sub-populations and performance to contracted metrics Transformed Utilization Management with provider/payer interoperability

Learning Stage

Supports understanding of standard quality metrics and current state of quality performance

Investing Stage

Supports establishing evidence-based quality goals with ongoing data collection for measuring improvement and progress towards goals

Aligning Stage

Supports benchmarking quality performance results and executing improved outcomes towards person-centered care

Transforming Stage

Supports using standardized system-wide processes to predict rising risk within populations to improve patient experience and drive high-quality care for all

Pay-for-Performance

Developing an incentive structure to demonstrate successful achievement of defined process and clinical measures to earn shared savings and/or incentive payments

Collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO)

Report of the status of a patient’s health conditions that comes directly from the patient, without interpretation of the patient’s response by a clinician or anyone else; examples of patient self-reported data collection tools include Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Medicare Health Outcomes Survey, FOTO Patient Outcomes

Pay-for-Reporting

Developing an incentive structure to demonstrate successful achievement of defined process and clinical measures to earn shared savings and/or incentive payments

Quality Outcomes Reporting (including specialty-oriented)

Integration with Data/Infrastructure measurement track for Enterprise Data Warehouse. Includes establishing the importance of data quality in driving business decisions

Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes

Effective collection and analysis of patient-reported outcomes; timely collection and use of alternative collection methods (e.g., mobile devices)

Engages provider leadership in reconciling perceived conflicts between clinical quality and governmental and health plan performance quality metrics

Ensuring that provider/clinical stakeholders are included in quality reporting analysis and resolving potential conflicts early in the performance review period

KPI Management

Aligning on what key performance indicators the organization will focus on as well as tools to monitor results with actionable interventions

Transparent quality benchmarking methodology

Methodology must be adjusted for population mix, risk (including social determinants of health) and market. Also includes participation in clinical registries

Incorporation of Patient-Reported Outcomes into performance reporting

Measure developers should construct quality measures that apply the outcome data collected by the tools to measure the quality of care

Aggregate quality reporting incorporating utilization, sites of service and patient outcomes

Inclusion of multiple sources and types of quality data for well-rounded measurement

Provider specific reporting incorporating quality, utilization, financial outcomes, and benchmark comparisons

Ensuring that quality reporting includes multiple sources of measurement and comprehensive assessment within a defined provider network/group

Enhanced Utilization, Financial, Quality & Outcomes Reporting across sub-populations

Aggregated from multiple populations/subpopulations to identify multi-dimensional opportunities

Coordinates clinical quality and performance metrics across governmental and commercial health plans enabling synergistic improvements in health outcomes and total cost of care

Application of best practices and efficiencies identified from individual payer arrangements across all contracts

Quality Reporting

Supports capturing and benchmarking quality reporting metrics across populations to track total cost of care

Quality Performance

Emphasize ongoing quality monitoring and governance to drive support around quality-driven decision making

Organizational Quality Management Program

Standardize processes and structure to reduce variation, achieve predictable results, and improve outcomes for patients, healthcare systems, and organizations. Structures may include technology, culture, and leadership

Quality Improvement Assessments

Processes that include testing acceptance/adherence to new/revised practices, determining how the new practices are affecting the delivery of patient-centered care, assessment of how much patient care is improving

Measurement Framework

Understanding the organizational approach/framework on quality measurement that will be used for consistent monitoring and comparison year over year

Evidence Based Decisions & Support

Understanding the value and purpose of effective decision making by leveraging data analysis and information. Putting support systems in place to ensure compliance and inter-rater reliability

Utilization Management

Framework to evaluate medical necessity, appropriateness and efficiency of health care services, procedures, and facilities

Medical Policy Review

Collection and clinical review of medical records and related information for specific conditions/procedures against predefined guidelines and requirements

Identify low-value care

Services that provide little or no benefit to patients, have potential to cause harm, incur unnecessary costs to patients, or waste limited healthcare resources; data-driven process

Utilization Management Enhancements to reduce barriers to care

Includes re-evaluation of prior authorization list to eliminate low value/non-standard sub-categories and electronic submissions

Standardized Medical Policies across population

Configuration of medical policies guidelines to be applicable for entire population instead of specific sub-populations; eases burden on providers to determine applicability of medical policies for specific patient types

Develop approach to address low-value care

Approach may include focus on appropriateness of care that is anchored in improving outcomes (high-value care)

Clinician leadership receives quality outcomes and participates in results’ interpretation

Ensuring clinical stakeholders participate in outcomes discussions to determine interventions and next steps

Utilizes insights from reporting to support provider specific and system improvements

Application of quality performance results to drive provider specific process improvements

Quality standards and benchmarks for top performance

Using top performance benchmarks and quality standards to align quality improvement plan targets

Inclusive and equitable Health Policies

Includes comparison against industry standards and best practices

Ongoing monitoring of low-value care

Incorporating low-value care monitoring and analysis into ongoing quality performance reviews

Utilization Management leveraging AI-assisted clinical reviews and gold-carding

Increased clinical review efficiency and accuracy to reduce administrative burden

Utilizes insights from enhanced reporting to drive improvements across sub-populations and performance to contracted metrics

Application of quality performance results to drive larger scale process improvements that influence larger populations and drive improvements with contracted metrics

Transformed Utilization Management with provider/payer interoperability

Includes implementation of FHIR API standards